Lime Aid is mostly deep iirc.
↧
Deep Stack posted by snarble5 @ Fri, 20 Apr 2012 04:11:15 +0000
↧
Deep Stack posted by meowjr @ Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:13:22 +0000
Deuce plays podcast.
↧
↧
Another Classic Hand posted by thewayimwired @ Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:28:58 +0000
In the hand FoxwoodsFiend folded and Durrrr showed 88. My mind is still blown to this day.
↧
Let's talk about BldSwtTrs! posted by hayes13 @ Sun, 22 Apr 2012 01:47:20 +0000
His name is Jeff, he was born circa 1982, has a twin brother and is from the San Diego area. He moved to Sweden or something after the UIGEA where he played on iPoker. His Party sn used to be BLdSWtTRs, then he changed it to SheCantSayNo. He printed money 9 tabling 10/20 with an insane win rate of 8ptbb/100 for hundreds of thousands of hands; lolo was apparently the only one who won more on that site.
He was only like a 24 VPIP but took interesting post flop lines like this one:
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1323273
He played on stars under NOtThiSTiMe and raped h@llinggol repeatedly HU. Some people think he might have been 20 Buck Spin. His actual coaching rate was 1600 an hour. He's the only well known player to score 150 on the donkey test. Whitelime suggested he might be cheating at some point but then retracted it once he realized he really was the stone cold nuts. He was a bankroll nit and thought it was optimal to have ~1,000 buy ins or something for whatever limit you were playing. It kind of makes sense when you go over that post referenced by the OP wherein it becomes apparent his disregard for losing a buy in (or 30 buy ins!) going to war with other regs allowed him to push people around like a boss. Apparently he was also one of the first people to suggest your true winrate or abilities aren't fully discernible without a sample size of 500k hands or more.
So yeah, basically light years ahead of everyone. He was also involved in one of the most interesting hands I've ever seen posted on 2+2: http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=5582896&page=0&fpart=all&vc=1
He also hated short stackers intensely, something I find sympathetic.
Wow, thanks for the old two plus two post, it is fucking amazing.
Just don't try it at micros 
↧
Let's talk about BldSwtTrs! posted by hayes13 @ Sun, 22 Apr 2012 01:54:36 +0000
If you guys enjoyed that one here is a hand he posted on two plus two, taken from:
http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=5351931&page=0&fpart=7&vc=1
A hand for all my great fans.
I'll title this one
lolo got TRICKED
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (6 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx
CO ($2083.25)
Button ($1555.90)
SB ($2433)
BB ($1958)
BLdSWtTRs ($7020)
MP :#A500AF(loloTRICKEDu)/ ($5979.40)
Preflop: BLdSWtTRs is UTG with 7, T. SB posts a blind of $10.
BLdSWtTRs raises to $72, MP :#A500AF(loloTRICKEDu)/ raises to $252, 4 folds, BLdSWtTRs calls $180.
Flop: ($534) 5, 6, T (2 players)
BLdSWtTRs checks, loloTRICKEDu bets $400, BLdSWtTRs calls $400.
Turn: ($1334) 3 (2 players)
BLdSWtTRs checks, loloTRICKEDu checks.
River: ($1334) 5 (2 players)
BLdSWtTRs checks, loloTRICKEDu bets $1000, BLdSWtTRs calls $6368 (All-In), loloTRICKEDu folds.
Final Pot: $8702
Main Pot: $8702, returned to BLdSWtTRs.
Results in white below:
BLdSWtTRs has 7h Th (two pair, tens and fives).
Outcome: BLdSWtTRs wins $8702.
right before he folded he said nut flush
↧
↧
well i was confused 10/20 live posted by hayes13 @ Sun, 22 Apr 2012 01:58:21 +0000
NH, he has to discount flushes some what since you might check back? or would you rarely do this when you are so deep?
↧
well i was confused 10/20 live posted by Luke00016 @ Sun, 22 Apr 2012 02:54:23 +0000
NH, he has to discount flushes some what since you might check back? or would you rarely do this when you are so deep?
Are you asking if hero checks back his flush on the river? Doing so would be criminal.
↧
well i was confused 10/20 live posted by Schweig @ Sun, 22 Apr 2012 03:00:32 +0000
Are you asking if hero checks back his flush on the river? Doing so would be criminal.
He means check back the turn.
↧
well i was confused 10/20 live posted by hayes13 @ Sun, 22 Apr 2012 11:14:06 +0000
NH, he has to discount flushes some what since you might check back? or would you rarely do this when you are so deep?
i meant barrelling the turn with a FD. often 100 bb deep we will check back turn? or are we barreling the turn more often when we are deep .
↧
↧
JJ vs older guy huge donk shove 200bb posted by hayes13 @ Sun, 22 Apr 2012 12:36:12 +0000
i donno, this is sick. i think he has a boat. but i just took donk test again and scored 120. so maybe i have too many monsters under my bed.
sounds tilting to have rich old men laugh in a spot like this. like they are trying to goat you into calling.
is the flop rainbow? i assume yes, so we cant have A3s type hands.
I just don't think many people can over bet without the nuts.
I donno, I change my mind, i would call.
What did he have?
↧
well i was confused 10/20 live posted by I3betyoutillyoudie @ Sun, 22 Apr 2012 12:52:01 +0000
NH, he has to discount flushes some what since you might check back? or would you rarely do this when you are so deep?
I don't think i would be checking back vs him as i can just win the money he's put in now a lot of the time given how he was playing before
↧
Let's talk about BldSwtTrs! posted by Mr. Fantastic @ Tue, 24 Apr 2012 01:47:03 +0000
Whitelime suggested he might be cheating at some point but then retracted it once he realized he really was the stone cold nuts.
Edit: limon, not whitelime. I had my citrus fruit screen names confused!
↧
A certain hand on High Stakes Poker Season 5 Episode 1 posted by flare805 @ Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:01:26 +0000
Hi guys, it's my first time posting here, and anyway I found a hand and what Tom Dwan said interesting during the first episode of HSP S5, btw, if you wanna check it out, it starts at the 21.52 in the episode. So here goes, at blinds of $400/$800 and ante of $200
Peter Eastgate raises to $2500 in MP2 with A
6 and picks up 3 callers with Tom Dwan with 7
6 at BB.
Flop comes: 6
5 3
SB checks, Tom Dwan(BB) bets $7,700 into $11,4600.
Peter Eastgate(MP2) calls $7,700 to make a $27,000 pot.
Everyone else folds.
Turn comes : 6
Tom Dwan(BB) bets $20,200 into $27,200, Peter Eastgate(MP2) calls.
River comes: K
Tom Dwan(BB) bets $53,900 into $67,400, Peter Eastgate(MP2) calls.
Then, Tom Dwan gets shocked and when Peter Eastgate asked whether he should've reraised, Dwan said that he should have.
Now my question is that, do you guys think it would be legit for Peter to reraise there? Imo, 74s and 42s would have been close to the btm of Dwan's preflop calling range, but he could also have pocket 3s pocket 5 and 56s.
Hope you guys will answer my question! Thanks alot! I'm just starting to learn about poker recently haha!
↧
↧
A certain hand on High Stakes Poker Season 5 Episode 1 posted by geneius @ Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:09:49 +0000
No, what happened was Eastgate asked Dwan if he would have called had Eastgate raised. And Dwan said yes. Dwan is saying he would have called with his exact holding. "Should Eastgate have raised?" is a different question because Eastgate does not know Dwan's holding. You were being results oriented just now! We typically try to avoid this when thinking about poker hands as much as possible.
↧
A certain hand on High Stakes Poker Season 5 Episode 1 posted by ninjacut @ Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:15:07 +0000
Does he need to raise top of his range when all the straight draws and flush draw misses? Is this the question you're asking?
↧
A certain hand on High Stakes Poker Season 5 Episode 1 posted by thewayimwired @ Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:25:31 +0000
I think eastgate played it fine and that a lot of Durrrrr's reaction as well as the table's was needling/head games.
↧
A certain hand on High Stakes Poker Season 5 Episode 1 posted by joel @ Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:53:05 +0000
I don't think Eastgate should raise this river. Dwan has shown a lot of strength on a paired board, so Eastgate could clearly already be beat (FH, straights). Also, a raise by Eastgate here would look incredibly strong -- basically only a FH would do this. Despite what Dwan said on the show, I doubt he would call with his actual holding, unless he has good reason to believe Eastgate is bluffing.
In other words, a raise accomplishes nothing: you're pretty much always folding out worse (apart perhaps for straights, although straights may call), and always getting called or reraised by better.
In microstakes, a raise/fold here would be very good play though... 
↧
↧
A certain hand on High Stakes Poker Season 5 Episode 1 posted by JaKoB_19 @ Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:00:41 +0000
I just think Durrr thinks he has best hand almost always when Eastgate calls turn and calls river so he was little shocked. I don't think Eastgate should raise river though. As joel said, it accomplishes nothing.
↧
A certain hand on High Stakes Poker Season 5 Episode 1 posted by flare805 @ Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:30:05 +0000
You were being results oriented just now! We typically try to avoid this when thinking about poker hands as much as possible.
geneius what do you mean by me being results oriented? And yea I'll try to avoid being that! ( Once I know what it means haha)
Does he need to raise top of his range when all the straight draws and flush draw misses? Is this the question you're asking?
Not exactly my question, but how would you answer your question because its very interesting, for me i feel he doesn't need to raise top of his range because like geneius said Eastgate doesn't know Dwan's holding and like what joel said, Dwan has shown lots of strength on a paired board.
Btw, thank you everyone for your response!
↧
Let's talk about BldSwtTrs! posted by thewayimwired @ Sat, 28 Apr 2012 18:27:30 +0000
Limon is such a joke. A real life Joey Knish. I'm sure he brutalised my friend in the 5/10 at Commerce though.
↧